Errant Thoughts…

A site for me to share my thoughts, travels or whatever else might be on my mind…

Hi, My Name Is Dave… Part 1

Posted by:

|

On:

|

,

Like many Catholics I choose the Easter season to go to confession in the hope that God would forgive me and help me be a better person (it’s a Catholic thing). As I stood in line waiting for my turn to spill my guts, I kept going over the things I came prepared to share (I even wrote them down). However, I soon realized that those things paled in comparison with two things that have been constantly on my mind of late. So, when it came my turn, I went into the confessional, shook the priest’s hand, and proceeded to share the two things I had recognized only moments before.

– First, I have internalized a growing anger toward folks that don’t share my opinion about the state of our nation / world. Frankly, in my arrogance, I was angry at them because I was convinced that they were unwilling to face facts. I mean, come on people! Open your eyes! I’m right!

– Secondly, and most importantly, I realized that I was frustrated because I didn’t share my views freely… like I saw them doing. My Mom’s teachings kept coming to mind that I should be courteous and avoid upsetting someone. But more importantly, I was scared to express my views for fear of alienation and reprisal.

So, was I really mad at others that didn’t share my views; or, was I mad at myself for not having the courage to openly express my views? Woah, now that’s a revelation!

I realized that I would continue to be frustrated and angry until I overcame my fears and spoke out. I don’t know whether I am right about everything (or anything) but I must feel free to share my views, accept that some others won’t agree, and hope that I don’t alienate anyone. I pondered how to express myself in a way to avoid insulting those who have differing views, while causing everyone to give a bit more thought to what we want from ourselves, our government, our country and our world. I certainly don’t think I fit the stereotypes that have been used to categorize those that are opposed what has been going on of late. I see myself as a moderate that swings slightly left and right depending on the issue. I also find myself in agreement with the basis for some of the Administration’s policies; while being opposed to the way they have implemented them. As a result, I decided that the best thing I could do would be to confess what I do / do not believe in (do / do not support). Maybe, like the alcoholic at a AAA meeting, my sharing will start me on the road to forgiving myself and others. So, hi, my name is Dave and here’s what I do / do not believe:

• First and foremost, I believe that all things should come in moderation. I totally agree with the old adage that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions.” I also believe that very few things are really “black and white” with almost everything falling into some shade of gray. I can give a bunch of examples regarding this from wokeness, to DOGE, to immigration, to DEI, etc. and will touch on several.

I am totally opposed to demonizing those who are already marginalized, or who don’t coincide with specific policy positions. A couple examples:


o I cannot agree with the use of broad-brush terms like: “murderers, terrorists, rapists gang members and cat / dog eaters” when referring to migrants. There have been statements like: “They’ll cut your throat.” “We allow them to come in and raid and rape our country. That’s right, I used the word rape.” 

According to the U.S. Department of Customs and Protection, in 2024 there were 17,048 crimes committed by immigrants / migrants (including crimes that had been committed outside of the U.S. and the crime of “illegal entry into the U.S.”). I struggled to find data on the total number of immigrants / migrants entering the U.S. in 2024, but every reference I could find puts it in the “millions”. So, if I said that there were one million immigrants (probably more like 2 or 3 million) associated with 17,048 crimes this puts the percentage of crimes committed by immigrants at a 1.7%. In 2023 the Cato Institute reported that 932 crimes were committed by legal and illegal immigrants per 100,000, while natural born Americans committed 1,221 crimes per 100,000. So, natural born Americans are committing more crimes per 100,000. In addition, about 87% of all folks living in the U.S. are natural born citizens (well over 250 million). This means that the large, large majority of crimes are being committed by natural born Americans. Bottom line, only a small percentage of immigrants / migrants are committing crimes, with the large majority only seeking a better life. They aren’t all murders, rapists, terrorists, gang members, and thugs!

o The elimination of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs has become a key goal for the current administration. As a result, there has been countless actions taken, and statements made, that negatively paint individuals that might fall within DEI categories (basically anyone other than white males). We’ve seen references to “DEI hires”. We’ve seen the Department of Defense (DoD) taking action to eliminate any reference that could possible be construed as being associated with DEI. The DoD has flagged reference to the U.S. warplane that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima (the Enola Gay), because it includes the word “Gay”. We’ve seen the removal of references to medal of honor winners… because they were black. We’ve seen a variety of negative events being blamed on DEI efforts, including the crash of a helicopter into a commercial jet outside of D.C. There have been claims that the FAA has hired unqualified and incompetent air traffic controllers due to diversity hiring practices. One specific statement regarding the FAA, that came after the crash, was that it was “actively recruiting workers who suffer severe intellectual disabilities, psychiatric problems, and other mental and physical conditions a diversity and inclusion hiring initiative.” NO! Not all folks that were given a step up under DEI initiatives are incompetent, or somehow lesser to a possible white male counterpart! The U.S. is a melting pot of races, creeds and sexual orientations and that has contributed to its strength!

Bottom line, I believe we should be focused on fully understanding the issues and addressing resulting problems in a thoughtful manner. The use of extreme references and unsupported accusations only hurts the situation by increasing animosity and divisions.


I support Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs, that are intended to give every American an equal shot at the American Dream, provided they are willing to work for it. I recently read an article by Maria Cassano that looked at conservative and liberal perspectives of what DEI means. She then tried to put DEI in simple terms, based on what she believes: “DEI means that anyone who applies to get a job gets a fair shot, regardless of their age, skin color, who’s in their bed or what’s in their pants.” She then went on to describe what DEI should not mean. “DEI does not mean that hiring managers are lowering their standards to include people who aren’t qualified for the job.” This makes total sense to me.

White males have historically gotten an edge in university admissions and in hiring since our nation was formed. For example, in her article Maria Cassano, reported on an interesting study done in 2021 that sent out over 83,000 fake job applications and resumes. All of the resumes listed similar qualifications and experience. The only difference was that some applications included inherently black names while others included inherently white names. In the study every single company prioritized the applicants with the white sounding name. History will continue to repeat itself, and we will avoid using our best and brightest, unless we do something to effect change. It would seem to me that we should be focusing on ensuring that DEI programs are managed in a way that gives every American an equal shot at the American Dream, rather than insisting that DEI is evil or, in contrast, that DEI is the sole solution.

Well, I am only three points into this manifesto with at least twenty other points to go. Clearly this is going to take more than one post.  So, chew on this one and stay tuned for further confessions of “Hi, my name is Dave…”

10 responses to “Hi, My Name Is Dave… Part 1”

  1. Chuck Bremer Avatar
    Chuck Bremer

    Hi, Dave, my name is Chuck…

    …and as I greatly feel similarly to your first two bullets, but as I am not Catholic, am waiting to hear Part two and any suggestions to address them you may have gotten from the Priest.

    …and if the new Pope would change those.

    Thanks!

  2. Dan McCausland Avatar
    Dan McCausland

    Dave,
    Good piece. I have a couple of thoughts.
    1. The attacks on DEI are shallow attempts to play up to the MAGA white male base. There is no one on that side believing that DEI might have a positive role to play in balance and fairness. It’s a shame, but then again their leader is shallow and not very bright so it works for him. Hitler did essentially the same thing with the Jews. Look up Kristallnacht and you can see how it worked.
    2. Most of the “illegal” aliens are hard working people who work to support their families back in shit holes like parts of Mexico, El Salvador, Peru, etc. They’re trying to get out of really bad situations. BTW – might want to print the text on the Statue of Liberty specifically welcoming aliens. We aren’t too worried about Europeans, Poles, Irish, Scots, and Scandinavians – but that’s because they are “like us”.
    Keep at it. You are doing the Lord’s work.
    Dan

  3. Jeffrey McCausland Avatar
    Jeffrey McCausland

    Dave — good piece! I would make two comments.

    First, it is always easy to rationalize and select the white male for any position. If you don’t believe me…ask your wife or daughter (if you have one….)

    Second, DEI considerations are always described as a matter of fairness and promoting merit as the prime consideration. Since this is now a primary focus in the Dept of Defense can anyone tell me how Hegseth got to be SecDef? It was NOT based on qualifications or merit. Served honorably as a junior officer which has little to nothing to do with being SecDef. No national security or interagency experience. No senior corporate leadership experience to lead largest corporation on the planet. Headed up two relatively small non-profits and drove both into near bankruptcy. Qualifications…white…male…looks good on television.

    Another consideration for selecting someone for a position is what they offer the team in terms of perspective and knowledge of the clients, customers, constituents, etc. that the organization serves. This is not a plea for incompetence but rather a suggestion that you need a team that will understand those you serve and provide you a better understanding of how to appeal to them. This does not only mean a group that has people with diverse ethnic, religious, or sexual backgrounds but also a broader swath of generations. Organizations that “listen” to the input from their employees are the most successful organizations.

    1. Dave Avatar

      Jeff,

      Thanks for the comments. I think you are spot on with the point that in hiring for a “team” position you really really need to think about the demographics of your customers and the existing make-up of the team. In so doing, a white male may not even bring some of the perspective that the team needs.

  4. Stephen Miller Avatar
    Stephen Miller

    Foremost, I am glad the Blog is back. It is always quite thought provoking.

    Immigration
    Many have demonized immigration by casting that nearly everyone who comes across the border is “illegal.” The reality is that many of these people are “legal” according to our system of laws because they have claimed “asylum.” BTW, 70% of farmworkers are immigrants. Approximately a third of all farm workers (~1.5 million) are undocumented. Who is going to harvest our crops?

    DEI
    Last year the USDA created the Local Food Purchasing Assistance (LFPA)program. The intent of the program was to purchase from local farmers fruits and vegetables for distribution to foodbanks. When the IL Department of Human Services wrote the regulations for LFPA they required that the farmers be “socially disadvantaged.” Examples of those “socially disadvantaged” included any farmer who is black, Native American, LGBTQ, or female among other categories. They even went as far as categorizing anyone in certain counties as being “socially disadvantaged.” Madison county was not included.
    This attempt at DEI, like many other DEI efforts, was based on broad categories of people rather than on individual circumstances, such as income level. The Supreme Court in the 2023 landmark college admissions case said that individual needs or merit should be the determining factor, not broad and arbitrary categories. Simply, basis should not be made on the color of one’s skin, but on the content of their character.

    Just one more comment on “inclusion.” The IL Attorney General and the Department of Human Rights have directed the IL High School Association to permit athletes to compete in sports based on their “gender identity.” This is in conflict with the view of most on the intent of Title IX. But in our state letting men compete in girl’s sports is acceptable.

    1. Dave Avatar

      Steve, thanks so much for your comments. I can’t say that I disagree with anything you’ve written. Again, as I said in my blog, I find most actions based on the extremes of a topic to be incorrect and your DEI examples are certainly among what I would consider to be extreme and beyond the original intent (all things in moderation). That being said, let’s step back and rework DEI policies / procedures to fit the 21st century and the original intent, rather than ban it entirely and demonize the term DEI.

      Also, your comment about transgender individuals in sports gives me an idea for a new blog. I’ve been thinking for a while that there is a lot of concern expressed about individuals who are physically male competing in women’s sports. At the same time I haven’t seen any complaints about someone who is physically female competing in a man’s sport. I wonder what would happen if we made certain sports “gender inclusive” (everyone gets to compete together). They have already started doing this with TV related sports like “American Ninja Warrior” but I don’t think that they have done a very good job at devising events that are gender neutral (seems like a lot more upper body events than lower body). As an aside, imagine if gymnastics became gender neutral??? I’m thinking that the ladies may kick butt over the men in in certain events and I doubt many guys would be very happy about doing the balance beam!

      Dave

  5. Jeff Boice Avatar
    Jeff Boice

    Hi, Dave!

    I appreciate you taking the time to state your beliefs. I consider myself to be center-right, and these are my beliefs.

    I too believe in moderation. 

    I too do not believe in broad brush strokes. They are never accurate and are always intended to inflame to persuade rather than inform. Nazi is another good example to add to the ones you mentioned.

    I believe that any immigrant who has entered this country illegally, has no right to expect government subsidized welfare, health care, housing assistance, or any other form of government assistance. If the Catholic Church or private citizens via charity organizations choose to subsidize illegal immigrants, I support that whole heartedly. Tax payer funds, however, should be used for citizens only. I also believe that illegal immigrants have no right to due process in regards to deportation. I am pro-immigration, but not pro-Illegal immigration.

    I am pro DEI as long as it is secondary to merit. 

    So we do still have some overlap in our beliefs. I will be interested to hear your take on DOGE. Thanks for sharing!  

    JB

    1. Dave Avatar

      Hi Jeff,

      Thanks for your comments! I often believe that folks will find that they agree about more things than they might think… if they just take the time to talk about it.

      I fully understand your thoughts about illegal immigrants, however I don’t think that we can consider this a black and white issue right now. I am going to write a blog that includes my thoughts on immigration so I’ll save most of my thoughts for later. However, you might want to consider the following:

      – Illegal immigrants aren’t eligible for much in the way of government assistance right now, but they certainly contribute to the support of such programs by their spending in the community and the taxes they pay (even if it is only sales tax).
      – The U.S. has to take some responsibility for destabilizing some Central and South American countries, which has resulted in some of the flight from those countries to the U.S. In addition, it is our drug use that is funneling the cartels that are creating havoc in some of those countries.
      – The current U.S. immigration system is broken. It can take years to immigrate legally. It includes a quota system that is totally unrealistic (for example, the Marshall Islands, with a population less than 50,000 has a quota that is similar to India and Mexico).

      As a nation we have avoided fixing our immigration system for years (both Democrats and Republicans). Before we cast stones at the illegal immigrants, many of whom are just seeking a better life, I think we need to clean up our own house. We need an efficient system, based on the 21st century world we live in.

      Look forward to your thoughts when I write more on immigration.

      Dave

  6. Joyce Weed Avatar
    Joyce Weed

    I have to read this a couple more times but I understand what you are saying. Needs some thought before I comment too much on it!

  7. Ruth Avatar
    Ruth

    Don’t forget how they are coming after women

Leave a Reply to Joyce Weed Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *